Should Google Plus be Part of Your Social Media Strategy?

Lately I’ve been wondering just how much or how little I should be talking, with clients and with groups I present to, about the still relatively new but in many ways quite fascinating service, Google Plus.

Google+The company calls this the Google+ Project and explains it as “real life sharing, re-thought for the web”.

Ambitious concept.

Right now, I’m pretty sure my real life sharing works more simply and more effectively than my attempts on Google+ to share and join in other peoples’s sharing.

But it’s early days and many people are trying to figure out whether this is truly the Next Big Thing, or another great idea by Google that never got sufficient traction to become a serious contender in the battle of the social media platforms (remember Google Wave?).

I don’t want to overload clients and others with bright, shiny, new social media items for the sake of it, but at the same time I don’t want to neglect alerting them to things I think they should know about, so that they can keep up with the game, so to speak.

Because the fact is, when I’m talking about social media with business people who are not heavily into the topic, I find many of them feel quite overwhelmed with the plethora of social networking platforms and options. So, rather than adding to their overwhelm, I endeavour, while still sketching for them the big picture about social business, to chunk it down to digestible portions.

That usually includes providing my recommended list of a handful of platforms any business should be on or at least consider being on. I should mention that, in terms of the people I’m usually addressing, the list is focused on what I would regard as basic in terms of doing business in the USA, Canada, the UK, South Africa, Australia, New Zealand. For China, Brazil and a number of other countries the options vary, with different platforms having to be taken into account.

With that latter proviso, the basic list was until recently: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, company blog.

Just how  and to what extent each of those or other platforms are to be used most effectively will depend on a particular company’s business and social media strategies.

So if I want people to feel confident about my basic list, as I do, would I even consider including Google Plus as part of the recommended basic kit?

Well, given what I’ve seen so far, I believe that even at this early stage businesses should know about Google+ and individuals within the business who have business management or social media management responsibilities should be aware of it and probably should join and put some time into learning how it works.

It may well be that Google+ will soon be part of my recommended “basic business kit” for social media engagement.

But at least one key factor for me, before that happens, is that the user base will need to be more reflective of the wider population. As Richard McManus observed in an interesting post yesterday, “While Google Plus has a fervent base of early adopter users, it hasn’t managed to attract mainstream people yet.”

So the short answer is no, not part of the recommended basic kit – or not yet.

As far as I can tell, becoming a Google+ user is still by invitation only. Like many others, I have quite a stack of invitations, so if you have not yet received an invitation and would like one, please email me at deswalsh(at)gmail(dot)com and ask: I’ll be happy to send until they run out.

Next week, as part of my monthly free Social Media Strategy webinar series, I will be focusing on Google+ for business, going through the various features and indicating where I see possibilities and limitations for this platform in the business context. If you have not yet registered for these webinars, you might like to do so at this link (recordings of all the previous webinars are available for registered participants).

Search Tip: The Why and How of ALT Attributes for Images

This post might look a bit geeky, but the subject matter is important for usability of websites and blogs, and for its search implications. In other words, the information here can help your search engine ranking. And the core information comes from the horse’s mouth – via a key Google operative.

I have a working knowledge of Hyper Text Markup Language or HTML, the publishing language of the World Wide Web. Enough to do basic modifications and updates on websites and blogs. I know that using ALT attributes for image tags is a Good Thing, not least for reasons of accessibility – a blind person or one with a visual disability is going to be frustrated in reading a page, say via Braille, if there is no ALT attribute for an image. This is especially important if the image is crucial for understanding the website page or blog post.

The ALT attribute is also useful for Search Engine Optimization (SEO).

In addition, the ALT attribute also serves when, for whatever reason, the browser cannot display the image, or images have been turned off. The text – “ALT”=”alternative” – is then displayed on the viewer’s screen.

Watching a short video just now (thanks to John Jantsch for the link), where Matt Cutts from Google explains the why and how of using ALT attributes, was a good prompt for me on all this. Not least because it reminded me that if I want Google (or any other search engine) to include my images in its search activities, I need to make it easier for the search engine to discover just what the image is about. And it seems that having a title for the image, while good, does not serve the same function or have the same value as the ALT attribute.

In the days when I hand-coded most of the image inserts in web pages, I used to be very assiduous in adding ALT attribute. More recently, using a variety of offline and online blog editing tools, which do not universally provide a prompt to insert an ALT attribute, I’ve been slack. For example, I’m composing this post on Microsoft’s excellent (and free) Windows Live Writer and if I want insert an image I click on an icon in the tool bar, then get a screen where I can either upload the image or enter a web address (URL) for one. But if I want an ALT attribute I have to switch to the HTML view and insert the code manually.

LiveWriter editing screen image insert

Although I regard LiveWriter as a superior editing too, on the ALT attribute score the editing tool in WordPress is more helpful.

When I want to insert an image, using the WordPress WYSIWYG tool, I click on the image icon in the toolbar and get a box for inserting the necessary details. Included is a field for “Image description” – which is in fact, the space for me to insert the ALT attribute:

WordPress editing tool insert image box

As in the next image:

WordPress editing tool insert image box, with text

Whichever editing tool I use, once I have inserted the image I will see it displayed in the draft, for example:

Floral display with Olympics logo, Temple of Heaven, Beijing

What the search engine and the person who is not visually able will be able to read is the wording in the ALT attribute, in this case “Floral display Olympics logo, Temple of Heaven, Beijing”. (Note that I could also put some “Title” coding in the HTML or a title under the image, but I don’t want to complicate the issue more than necessary.)

So now, with the three images above, because I’m composing in LiveWriter, I need to insert the ALT code manually. That will be true whether I do that here in LiveWriter or wait till I have sent the draft to my WordPress site. The alternative is to not insert the images here but wait till the text is in WordPress and then insert the images using the WordPress tool.

I prefer to do as much of the editing as I can in LiveWriter, including the insertion of images. For the person who wants to use LiveWriter or another offline editing tool but does not want to be fussed with the code, it is a sensible option to not insert the image until the text is ported to WordPress. That way you still have the sense of security that your text has been saved on your computer hard drive (provided you make sure to use the Save Local Draft option in LiveWriter) and is not at the mercy of a mid-drafting outage, always a risk in composing online (especially if, as happens from time to time where I live, a storm or other incident takes out your power and Internet connection).

I trust this post is helpful to readers wanting to make sure their images count in the search engines’ ranking. I welcome any technical corrections needed and practical suggestions for doing all this better.

I do hope a future update of LiveWriter will have something like the WordPress editing tool’s capacity for entering image-related details in a the “Normal” mode, so that it is not necessary to fiddle with the code (it’s so easy for me to mess up the code doing that and then have to laboriously sort it all out). I met some of the LiveWriter development team at BlogWorld Expo and was very impressed by their enthusiasm and keenness to have the product deliver as well as possible and will of course make sure they see this post :) .