<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would You Include Twitter as a Fellow Panelist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deswalsh.com/2008/04/25/would-you-include-twitter-as-a-fellow-panelist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deswalsh.com/2008/04/25/would-you-include-twitter-as-a-fellow-panelist/</link>
	<description>Social Media for Real Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marty Collins</title>
		<link>http://deswalsh.com/2008/04/25/would-you-include-twitter-as-a-fellow-panelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deswalsh.com/?p=130#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Nice write up Des. I was at the Twitter session and am not a Twitterer. I went to the session to understand better if I should start or if there is an opportunity I&#039;m missing in my Social Media plan.  I agree with Jeremiah, while entertaining there was no real business value to the session. People left the session the same way they came in, either loving Twitter and reconfirmed in that love or still shaking their heads saying &quot;I still don&#039;t get it.&quot; The Twittering on the screen was very distracting. You have a room full of Web 2.o people who like to make their voices heard. 

I think backchannels are very useful to get sessions back on track. But having the twitters on the screen completely takes away from the session message.  Sessions should deliver on the abstract that sold the session in the first place. The Twitter session didn&#039;t do that. That&#039;s my criteria, did I get what they promised me???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up Des. I was at the Twitter session and am not a Twitterer. I went to the session to understand better if I should start or if there is an opportunity I&#8217;m missing in my Social Media plan.  I agree with Jeremiah, while entertaining there was no real business value to the session. People left the session the same way they came in, either loving Twitter and reconfirmed in that love or still shaking their heads saying &#8220;I still don&#8217;t get it.&#8221; The Twittering on the screen was very distracting. You have a room full of Web 2.o people who like to make their voices heard. </p>
<p>I think backchannels are very useful to get sessions back on track. But having the twitters on the screen completely takes away from the session message.  Sessions should deliver on the abstract that sold the session in the first place. The Twitter session didn&#8217;t do that. That&#8217;s my criteria, did I get what they promised me???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://deswalsh.com/2008/04/25/would-you-include-twitter-as-a-fellow-panelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deswalsh.com/?p=130#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>To me, it&#039;s really a twitter meetup, or a twitter experiment, when you put the back channel as close as we did on stage.

As a result, there were funny comments (that added no value, but were somewhat distracting) so you&#039;ll need to set expectations up front to your audience and the conference organizer before doing this.

BTW Des, I met someone who is moving to Australia and will be doing some tech work, and she asked who she should meet and I immediately said you.  This was after my panel yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it&#8217;s really a twitter meetup, or a twitter experiment, when you put the back channel as close as we did on stage.</p>
<p>As a result, there were funny comments (that added no value, but were somewhat distracting) so you&#8217;ll need to set expectations up front to your audience and the conference organizer before doing this.</p>
<p>BTW Des, I met someone who is moving to Australia and will be doing some tech work, and she asked who she should meet and I immediately said you.  This was after my panel yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making Time to Read and Comment on Other Blogs : Thinking Home Business</title>
		<link>http://deswalsh.com/2008/04/25/would-you-include-twitter-as-a-fellow-panelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Making Time to Read and Comment on Other Blogs : Thinking Home Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deswalsh.com/?p=130#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>[...] some time researching, completing and publishing one blog post, but it was on another blog (see Would You Include Twitter as a Fellow Panelist?), not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some time researching, completing and publishing one blog post, but it was on another blog (see Would You Include Twitter as a Fellow Panelist?), not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
